Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://higia.imip.org.br/handle/123456789/733
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Clístenes Cristian de-
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Ana Beatriz Sáde-
dc.contributor.authorRegueira, Stéphanie Leite Pessoa de Athayde-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T15:22:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-14T15:22:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://higia.imip.org.br/handle/123456789/733-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Voice has shown association with difficult laryngoscopies though only with poor predictive performance. As machine learning (ML) algorithms are advocated to improve predictive performance as compared to regular logistic regression models, we aimed to evaluate predictive values of models from both ML algorithms and regular logistic regression including voice parameters for prediction of difficult laryngoscopies. Methods: A prospective cohort with patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgical procedures. We preoperatively collected data on sex, age, weight, height, body mass index and recorded audios from 5 different phonemes: /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, and /u/. The main outcome was difficult laryngoscopies defined as Cormack and Lehane's classes 3 or 4. Posteriorly, the formant frequencies were extracted from the recorded audios. Five formants were extracted from each phoneme, yielding 25 formants for each patient: 5 formants from each of the 5 phonemes. Uni and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate association between variables and to build the predictive models. Results: From a total of 453 patients, 29 (6.4%) presented difficult laryngoscopies. Sex (p=0.015), weight (p=0.009), height (p=0.001), and the formants eF2(p<0.001), eF3(p=0.002), iF2(p=0.011), and oF2(0.018) were associated with difficult laryngoscopies. Age (p=0.212) and BMI (p=0.108) did not present significant difference between the 2 groups. Six predictive models were built including the 25 voice formants. The ROC curves for the predictive models are presented in Figure 1 and their AUC were as follows: Logistic Regression model - LR (60.24%; 95% CI: 37.96-82.52%); Linear Discriminant Analysis - LDA (66.44%; 95% CI: 44.11-88.76%); Classification and Regression Trees - CART (50%; 95% CI: 50-50%); k-Nearest Neighbors - kNN (59.4%; 95% CI: 36.94-81.86%); Random Forest - RF (50.3%; 95% CI: 21.36-79.23%); Generalized Boosted Model - GBM (45.87%; 95% CI: 20.73-71%). Conclusions: ML algorithms did not improve airway prediction performed by voice parameters as compared to regular LR model.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.subjectLaringoscopiapt_BR
dc.subjectVozpt_BR
dc.subjectEstudos de Coortespt_BR
dc.titleMachine learning predictive models with voice parameters for prediction of difficult laryngoscopies: a prospective cohortpt_BR
dc.higia.programArtigos científicos colaboradores IMIPpt_BR
dc.higia.tipoArtigo Científicopt_BR
dc.higia.pages1 p.pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Carvalho CC -2021.pdf228.68 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.